Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kevin M. Johnson, M.D.'s avatar

First of all, I want to congratulate you and all of your efforts. I've been working through these posts and your YouTube videos. I have had a longstanding interest in Peirce; even though his writing is often quite difficult to understand — "flashes of brilliant light relieved against Cimmerian darkness! " as his friend William James said — nonetheless I frequently find myself startled by the depth and power of his insights.

I wish I knew of a book that I could recommend to others as a cogent introduction to his ideas, but I am unaware of one. My own understanding, as limited as it is, has come from undisciplined wandering about in his primary writings, with a little help from scholars.

Your ability to communicate these ideas is remarkable, and I hope you are considering putting your writings together into a popularly accessible book. I think the world could very much profit.

If I had one suggestion, it might be to more frequently point out things about which you are unsure, or where Peirce has been ambiguous. The allure of a complete system like his architectonic is seductive, but fallibilism, to which you subscribe, should I think be invoked more often to enhance your credibility. But there is power in tracing a bright through-line amidst his welter of ideas and not get lost in critiques and comparisons with other thinkers along the way, and you have done an astonishingly good job of this.

I wrote about related ideas in my blog https://anordinarydoctor.substack.com in the posts "The Immaterial World" which perhaps you would be interested to see. I will go back to it and think about how I might recast it using some of your ideas here.

Expand full comment
Sarah C Tyrrell's avatar

There are so many aspects to what you have written that I love. .... 'Place'. I often talk about placement. 'Continuity of irritations'. An excellent choice of words! ........ But "recognizing the particular meaning of some concrete sign"; This is where I struggle with humanity's skewed understanding due to nominalism. Particular to whom? Perhaps this is where we need to include an injection of horizon that compliments the verticalness. As I always say, 'There is no 'I' without the 'Not I'. ;-)

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts